Collateral 'Damage' From Proposed Rule 15b9-1 Amendment

Law360, New York ( July 13, 2015, 10:37 AM EDT) -- While the close of many of this country's futures trading pits has me waxing nostalgic about my career on the trading floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (later, CME Group Inc.), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's proposed amendment to Rule 15b9-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") has me wondering if the SEC truly understands the breadth of its net and the unintended "victims" of its proposed amendment. Full disclosure: before entering private practice, I worked for 15 years on the trading floors of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and CME Group Inc., in various capacities, for two floor brokerage companies. While my analysis of the proposed amendment is meant to be objective, my experience on the trading floor undoubtedly colors my view of rules affecting those who continue to engage in floor brokerage, market making and proprietary trading, both on and off the trading floor....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!