Section 298's Impact On Evidence At Patent Trials Thus Far
Law360, New York ( April 20, 2016, 11:45 AM EDT) -- In patent infringement jury trials, a defendant's failure to obtain an opinion of counsel despite having knowledge of a patent is often powerful evidence. A plaintiff can potentially use the absence of an opinion to support its positions on infringement, willfulness, validity, damages and other issues. Though it has received little attention, the America Invents Act includes a provision — 35 U.S.C. § 298 — that seeks to limit the use of the absence of such an opinion to prove willful infringement and inducement. Nearly five years after the provision's enactment, the published trial court and Federal Circuit opinions addressing Section 298 reveal differing applications of the statute, and lingering uncertainty about how it will impact the admissibility of evidence at trial....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.