AFA Considerations For Gov't Contract Claims Litigation
By Stephen McBrady ( July 14, 2017, 11:57 AM EDT) -- Government contractors consider filing claims against the government for any number of reasons. Some common fact patterns include increased performance costs attributable to government action or delay; costs resulting from government-initiated contract termination; costs of remediating certain environmental pollution and toxic tort litigation (when covered by indemnification clauses); and other costs to which contractors are entitled by operation of contract or statute. Each of these circumstances share one central feature — when performing on behalf of the government, the contractor incurred additional expense for which the government has a legal obligation to pay. . . .
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.
Law360's annual list of regional powerhouses reflects not only the work of exemplary firms, but also emerging legal trends in each state, from matters involving Colorado's growing life sciences industry, to an uptick in bankruptcies in Delaware, to the continued flurry of intellectual property litigation in California.
