Court's Sensible Analysis Saves Banker Fees In Bankruptcy
By Michael Cook, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP ( January 4, 2017, 11:22 AM EST) -- "Transaction fees are part of the standard, negotiated base compensation for the investment banker," held the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on Dec. 16, 2016. In re Relativity Fashion LLC, 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 4339, *10 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2016) (Wiles, B.J.). The court denied objections to the transaction fees sought by two investment bankers, P and H, ruling that the objecting parties (a fee examiner, the debtor and a secured lender) had no right under Bankruptcy Code § 328(a) to challenge the transaction fees. Id. at *25. Moreover, said the court, it "had no power to give anyone else [other than the U.S. trustee in this case] the right to assert objections based on ["reasonableness"] standards." Id. The sensible, sweeping opinion in Relativity Fashion is essential reading not only for investment bankers and their counsel, but also for lawyers and other business bankruptcy professionals....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.