Calif. High Court Should Review Pure Flix Idea Theft Case

By Peter Shimamoto ( January 24, 2019, 2:04 PM EST) -- A California Court of Appeal's November 2018 decision in an idea submission case, Sullivan v. Pure Flix Entertainment LLC,[1] misstates the applicable law and creates unwarranted potential exposure for studios. Under the reasoning set forth in Pure Flix, a studio could be liable to a party who pitched an idea for a motion picture to the studio, if the studio subsequently produces a motion picture that contains "core concepts" similar to those in the pitch, even though the studio was already aware of those concepts before the pitch, and even if the plot, themes, dialogue, mood, setting, pace, characters and sequence of events of the two works are significantly different. The Pure Flix decision is misguided and contrary to established law....

Law360 is on it, so you are, too.

A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.


A Law360 subscription includes features such as

  • Daily newsletters
  • Expert analysis
  • Mobile app
  • Advanced search
  • Judge information
  • Real-time alerts
  • 450K+ searchable archived articles

And more!

Experience Law360 today with a free 7-day trial.

Start Free Trial

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!