Calif. Asks Innovator Drug Brands To Do The Impossible
Law360, New York ( March 16, 2016, 12:30 PM EDT) -- Eight years ago, in Conte v. Wyeth, the California Court of Appeals shocked brand prescription drug manufacturers when it held that they could be liable for injuries caused by generic versions of their medications — an approach often called "innovator liability."[1] In 2012, the California Supreme Court raised hopes for Conte's early demise when, in an industrial product case, it signaled its disapproval of holding defendants liable for someone else's product. Instead, on March 9, a Court of Appeals panel extended the "innovator liability" doctrine to a manufacturer that had sold its interests in the medication in 2001, six years before the prescriptions at issue. In T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., the court exposed the brand manufacturer to liability for a label that it was powerless to change....
Law360 is on it, so you are, too.
A Law360 subscription puts you at the center of fast-moving legal issues, trends and developments so you can act with speed and confidence. Over 200 articles are published daily across more than 60 topics, industries, practice areas and jurisdictions.