Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Conceptus, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.
Case Number:
3:09-cv-02280
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Baker McKenzie
- Farella Braun
- Gard & Kaslow
- Greenberg Traurig
- Orrick Herrington
- Sidley Austin
- Weil Gotshal
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 30, 2012
Conceptus Shuns $19M IP Deal As Rival Pulls Contraceptive
Contraceptive maker Conceptus Inc. said Monday it would not collect $19 million in damages awarded by a California federal jury in a patent infringement suit, after Hologic Inc. agreed to take its allegedly infringing product off the market.
-
January 09, 2012
Conceptus Loses Injunction Bid In Contraceptive IP Fight
A California federal judge on Monday denied Conceptus Inc.'s bid for a permanent injunction against women's health technology firm Hologic Inc. from selling a birth control device that violated a patent covering permanent, noninvasive contraceptive systems.
-
October 17, 2011
Conceptus Scores $18.8M Victory In Hologic Patent Fight
A California federal jury on Monday awarded Conceptus Inc. $18.8 million after finding that Hologic Inc. infringed two claims of a Conceptus patent related to permanent, noninvasive contraceptive systems.
-
December 17, 2010
Contraceptive Makers Denied Quick End To Patent Suit
A federal judge has mostly rejected competing summary judgment motions filed by medical device makers Conceptus Inc. and Hologic Inc. in their patent infringement fight over permanent, noninvasive contraceptive systems.
-
August 18, 2010
Conceptus, Hologic Nix Non-IP Claims In Patent Spat
Medical device makers Conceptus Inc. and Hologic Inc. have decided to trim a patent infringement spat over their competing permanent, noninvasive contraceptive systems by dropping all unfair competition claims and counterclaims, allowing the case to move forward on patent claims alone.
-
November 10, 2009
Conceptus Fails To Block Rival Contraceptive System
A federal judge has denied Conceptus Inc.'s motion for a preliminary injunction in its patent infringement suit against Hologic Inc., allowing the rival medical device maker to continue selling a permanent contraception system that does not involve incisions.