Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Murphy et al v. Target Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:09-cv-01436
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 24, 2018
Target's $9M PAGA Deal Ending Seating Suits OK'd
A California judge said Tuesday he'll approve Target Corp.'s $9 million settlement resolving several suits alleging that the retailer violated the state's Private Attorneys General Act by failing to provide seating for more than 90,000 cashiers, calling it a model deal while expressing discomfort with its 40 percent attorneys' fee award.
-
October 02, 2012
Target Can't Shake Cashier Seating Suit
A California federal judge on Monday refused to toss a putative class action accusing Target Corp. of illegally withholding seating from its cashiers, finding that the company didn’t prove that its employees are exempt from applicable state labor laws.
-
June 14, 2012
Target Says Cashiers' Work Doesn't Permit Use Of Seats
Target Corp. asked a California federal judge Tuesday to dismiss a putative class action by two cashiers who claim the retailer fails to provide seating, arguing that the nature of the position does not permit the use of a seat.