Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Amanda Sateriale et al v. R J Reynolds Tobacco Co et al
Case Number:
2:09-cv-08394
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 08, 2016
RJ Reynolds To End 'Camel Cash' Dispute With $5M-Plus Deal
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. agreed Friday to resolve a class action filed in California federal court accusing it of wrongfully ending its "Camel Cash" promotion, saying it will allow customers to redeem the vouchers and pay more than $4.8 million in attorneys' fees and other awards.
-
December 23, 2014
RJ Reynolds 'Camel Cash' Suit Wins Cert. In Calif. Only
A California federal judge on Friday partially certified a class action alleging R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. broke a contract with customers by slashing merchandise from its "Camel Cash" promotion, limiting the class to California residents due to differences among states' contract laws.
-
September 15, 2014
RJ Reynolds Looks To Snuff Out 'Camel Cash' Class Action
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. on Monday urged a California federal judge to dismiss a putative class action alleging the company broke a contract with customers by slashing merchandise from its "Camel Cash" promotion, saying only customers who actually redeemed their vouchers had a contract with the company.