Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In re: Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
1:10-md-02196
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Bernstein Liebhard
- Boies Schiller
- Crowell & Moring
- Dickinson Wright
- Glancy Prongay
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Hartzog Conger
- Kenny Nachwalter
- Kerger Law Firm
- Lite DePalma
- McCarter & English
- McGuireWoods
- Pearson Warshaw
- Quinn Emanuel
- Robbins Geller
- Robins Kaplan
- Seeger Weiss
- Shumaker Loop
- Stearns Weaver
- Strange & Butler
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 27, 2011
Leggett & Platt Can't Duck Foam Price-Fixing MDL
The Ohio federal judge overseeing multidistrict antitrust litigation over polyurethane foam on Tuesday rejected Leggett & Platt Inc.'s request to reconsider a prior ruling denying the manufacturer's bids to dismiss the claims against it.
-
July 20, 2011
Polyurethane Foam Makers Can't Shake Price-Fixing MDL
An Ohio federal judge on Tuesday nixed a bid by over a dozen polyurethane foam makers to toss a multidistrict litigation accusing them of conspiring to fix prices, saying the allegations in the complaints are sufficient.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next →