Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Floyd et al v. The City of New York et al
Case Number:
1:08-cv-01034
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Abrams Fensterman
- Arnold & Porter
- Beldock Levine
- Clifford Chance
- Covington & Burling
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Dechert LLP
- DLA Piper
- Gibson Dunn
- Hale & Monico
- Hamilton Clarke LLP
- McAloon & Friedman
- Sheppard Mullin
- WilmerHale
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 30, 2014
NYPD Unions Denied Bid To Pursue Stop-And-Frisk Appeal
A Manhattan federal judge on Wednesday rejected police unions' bid to defend the constitutionality of stop-and-frisk tactics on appeal and accepted a deal between the city and plaintiffs who successfully claimed their rights were being trampled by the now-shelved anti-crime policy.
-
September 03, 2013
Stop And Fix Stop-And-Frisk, Quinn Tells Federal Judge
New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn said in a court filing Sunday she opposes the Bloomberg administration's bid to stay changes to its "stop-and-frisk" program while the city appeals a court ruling that the police anti-street crime tactic disproportionately targeted minorities.
-
August 27, 2013
NYC Seeks Stay On Judge's Stop-And-Frisk Ruling
Attorneys for the city of New York have asked a federal judge to stay injunctive relief ordered earlier this month related to the police department's anti-street crime tactic known as stop-and-frisk until an appeal is heard, according to a letter to the judge filed Tuesday.
-
August 12, 2013
Judge Says Race Taints NYPD Street Stops, Orders Fixes
A Manhattan federal judge on Monday told the New York City Police Department to fix its anti-street crime tactic known as stop-and-frisk, ruling the department's current methods violate the constitutional rights of blacks and Hispanics, who most often are targeted, and appointing a former top city lawyer as an independent monitor.