Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
IN RE JOHNSON & JOHNSON DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Case Number:
3:10-cv-02033
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Carella Byrne
- Cohn Lifland
- Foley Hoag
- Kantrowitz Goldhamer
- Lite DePalma
- Riker Danzig
- Robinson Miller
- Samuel & Stein
- Schnader Harrison
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 03, 2011
Shareholder Suit Over J&J Recall, Kickback Woes Tossed
A New Jersey federal judge on Thursday dismissed a derivative shareholder suit against health giant Johnson & Johnson, ruling the complaint lacked facts to show that J&J executives ignored warning signs about drug recalls, kickback schemes and other damaging incidents.
-
July 21, 2011
J&J Says Board Not To Blame For Recalls, Corruption Claims
Johnson & Johnson responded Monday to a slew of shareholder derivative actions in New Jersey federal court with a report stating the company's board of directors did not breach its duties and ignore warning signs of product recalls and illegal kickbacks and bribes.