Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
December 13, 2009
Motorola, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Case Number:
3:09-cv-05840
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker McKenzie
- Bingham McCutchen
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Covington & Burling
- Crowell & Moring
- Davis Polk
- Farmer Brownstein
- Freitas & Weinberg
- K&L Gates
- Law Office of John D. Cline
- Morrison Foerster
- Nossaman LLP
- Paul Weiss
- Sheppard Mullin
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- White & Case
- WilmerHale
Companies
- AU Optronics Corp.
- Chimei Innolux Corp.
- Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
- LG Display Co. Ltd.
- Panasonic Corp.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Sharp Corp.
- Signify N.V.
- Toshiba Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
July 31, 2012
Epson Pays $150M To Settle Motorola LCD Price-Fixing Feud
Seiko Epson Corp. said Tuesday that its subsidiary Epson Imaging Devices Corp. has settled for $150 million antitrust claims brought by Motorola Mobility LLC, ending its involvement in Motorola's multidistrict litigation over alleged price-fixing in the liquid crystal display market.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login