Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In Re: Celexa and Lexapro Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Case Number:
1:09-md-02067
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Dechert LLP
- Dugan Law Firm
- Fleming Nolen
- FrancoLaw PLLC
- Gianni Petoyan
- Hagens Berman
- Hemenway & Barnes
- Kasowitz Benson
- Korein Tillery
- Pendley Baudin
- Quinn Emanuel
- Seeger Weiss
- Shapiro Haber
- Skadden Arps
- Stinson LLP
- Sugarman Rogers
- Wisner Baum
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 15, 2014
Forest Gets Some Relief In Lexapro Marketing MDL
A Massachusetts federal judge has thrown out one suit and trimmed a state law claim from another in the ongoing multidistrict litigation accusing Forest Laboratories Inc. of marketing antidepressants Celexa and Lexapro for use on adolescents, even though the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had not approved them for that purpose.
-
March 14, 2014
Forest Pays Up To $10M In MDL Over Celexa, Lexapro
Forest Laboratories Inc. agreed to pay between $7.7 million and $10.4 million to settle multidistrict litigation accusing the drugmaker of misleading Missouri parents into buying Celexa and Lexapro for children although the drugs were only approved for adults, according to papers filed in Massachusetts federal court Thursday.
-
January 13, 2014
Forest Can't Nix Mo. Class In Antidepressant Marketing MDL
A Massachusetts federal judge on Friday certified a class of Missouri parents accusing Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc. of misleading them into buying antidepressants for their children that were only approved for adults, but he refused to approve similar proposed classes of New York and Illinois consumers.
-
February 05, 2013
Judge Denies Class Cert. In Antidepressant Marketing MDL
A Massachusetts federal judge denied class certification Tuesday in three coordinated lawsuits alleging Forest Pharmaceuticals Inc. illegally promoted antidepressants Celexa and Lexapro for use in children, saying plaintiffs in two cases didn't adequately represent their classes and another hadn't shown common issues predominated.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →