Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
IN RE: Regions Morgan Keegan Securities, Derivative and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Litigation - - MDL 2009
Case Number:
2:09-md-02009
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Apperson Crump
- Bass Berry
- Berke Berke & Berke
- Carey Danis
- Carney Bates
- Dobrowski Stafford
- Evans Petree
- Eversheds Sutherland
- Glassman Wyatt
- Harris Shelton
- James Bates Brannan
- Kane Russell
- Keller Rohrback
- Kirkland & Ellis
- K&L Gates
- Komlossy Law
- Labaton Keller
- Law Offices of Howard Prossnitz
- Lewis Thomason
- Lieff Cabraser
- Lockridge Grindal
- Maynard Nexsen
- Paul Hastings
- Schlam Stone
- Seeger Weiss
- Stranch Jennings
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 22, 2015
Regions Coughs Up $125M to End Suits Over Funds' Collapse
Regions Financial Corp. agreed to pay $125 million to end both a putative class action and shareholder derivative suit alleging it mismanaged three open-end mutual funds that tanked in 2007, according to a Tennessee federal court filing on Thursday.
-
December 19, 2013
Regions Agrees To $22.5M Deal In 401(k) Plan Class Action
Regions Financial Corp. agreed to a $22.5 million class action settlement in consolidated litigation accusing Regions of keeping its stock as an employee retirement plan option even though the company's risky loan practices made it an imprudent investment, according to a Tennessee federal court filing Wednesday.
-
October 15, 2012
Morgan Pays $68M To End Shareholder Suits Over MBS Funds
Morgan Keegan & Co. Inc. on Friday agreed in Tennessee federal court to pay $68 million to resolve a shareholder derivative action and a shareholder class action accusing the company of misleading investors about its mutual funds' risky holdings in asset-backed securities.
-
September 12, 2011
Morgan Mutual Fund Shareholder Suit Dismissed
A Tennessee federal judge on Friday tossed a shareholder derivative suit against Morgan Asset Management Inc. and managers of four of its mutual funds that claimed they misled investors over the funds' content and performance.