Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
James Estakhrian v. Mark Obenstine et al
Case Number:
2:11-cv-03480
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Chavez & Gertler
- Fay Law Group PLLC
- Grant Genovese
- Irvine Law Group
- Kemnitzer Barron
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lewis Brisbois
- Mehri & Skalet
- Munger Tolles
- Reid Collins
- Safarian & Baroian
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 29, 2016
Atty In King & Spalding Condo Suit Gets Discovery Sanctions
A California attorney involved in a proposed malpractice class action against King & Spalding LLP over a botched settlement in a Las Vegas condominium contract suit was smacked Monday with sanctions for failing to hand over emails during discovery, which a special master found was clearly in bad faith.
-
February 16, 2016
King & Spalding's $4.6M Malpractice Deal Gets Initial OK
A California federal judge on Tuesday gave initial support to a $4.6 million deal between King & Spalding LLP and a proposed class of investors accusing the firm of malpractice by forcing a shoddy settlement in a prior condominium contract suit, finding it to be a cogent resolution.
-
January 28, 2016
King & Spalding Wants Part Of $4.6M Malpractice Deal Secret
King & Spalding LLP asked a California federal judge on Thursday to keep under wraps some of the terms of a proposed $4.6 million deal in a suit accusing the firm and others of failing to disclose a conflict of interest in a Las Vegas condominium dispute.
-
January 22, 2016
King & Spalding Malpractice Claims Lack Evidence, Atty Says
A Las Vegas attorney in a proposed malpractice class action brought against him and King & Spalding LLP over a botched settlement in a condominium contract suit on Thursday urged a California federal judge to toss the action, saying all of the claims are speculative and lack specific evidence.
-
January 20, 2016
Atty In King & Spalding Malpractice Suit Escapes Sanctions
A California federal judge on Tuesday refused to sanction a Las Vegas attorney involved in a proposed malpractice class action against King & Spalding LLP over a botched settlement in a condominium contract suit, saying accusations that he withheld discovery should be brought before a special master.
-
September 10, 2015
King & Spalding Tries Again With $4.6M Malpractice Deal
Plaintiffs accusing King & Spalding LLP and others of botching the settlement of a condominium contract suit again sought approval for a $4.6 million deal to let the firm out of the suit, saying they've taken steps to avoid potential conflicts for absent class members.
-
July 09, 2015
King & Spalding Must Rework $4.6M Class Malpractice Deal
A California federal judge on Thursday refused to sign off on a $4.6 million deal to let King & Spalding LLP out of a malpractice class action over an allegedly botched settlement in a condominium contract suit, saying a related suit may disqualify most class counsel.
-
May 28, 2015
King & Spalding Will Pay $4.62M To Settle Condo Deal Fight
King & Spalding LLP has agreed to pay $4.62 million to settle a putative class action accusing the firm and others of violating consumer protection law by botching the settlement of a condominium contract suit, according to a Wednesday filing in California federal court.
-
August 25, 2011
Fight Over Condo Deal Doesn't Belong In Calif.: Attys
Marquis & Aurbach PC and a private practitioner on Wednesday urged a California federal judge to toss a putative class action accusing them and King & Spalding LLP of violating consumer protection law by botching the settlement of a condominium contract suit.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →