Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
June 17, 2005
IN RE: PLASTICS ADDITIVES ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)
Case Number:
2:05-md-01684
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Barrack Rodos
- Blank Rome
- Bolognese & Associates
- Buchanan Ingersoll
- Cera LLP
- Clark Hill
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Criden & Love
- Dilworth Paxson
- Duane Morris
- Eimer Stahl
- Fellheimer & Eichen
- Fine Kaplan
- Frankovitch Anetakis
- Goldman Scarlato
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Harkins Cunningham
- Hausfeld LLP
- Hutchings Barsamian
- Kaplan Fox
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Kohn Swift
- Lauletta Birnbaum
- Montgomery McCracken
- Morgan Lewis
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Preti Flaherty
- Rawle & Henderson
- Shook Hardy
- Spector Roseman
- Squire Patton
- Stevens & Lee
- Stradley Ronon
- Stueve Siegel
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
August 22, 2011
Rohm & Haas, Arkema Exit Plastic Additives MDL
Indirect purchasers in a multidistrict litigation accusing Rohm & Haas Co. and Arkema Inc. of fixing prices for plastic additives dropped their suit against the companies Thursday, a month after settling with the other defendants in the case.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login