Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Bruton v. Gerber Products Company et al
Case Number:
5:12-cv-02412
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 13, 2018
Gerber Buyers Denied Cert. In Baby Food False Ad Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday declined for a second time to certify a class of consumers accusing Gerber Products Co. of misbranding baby food, saying the company already changed the disputed labels and the proposed damages models are flawed.
-
December 13, 2016
Gerber Buyers Seek 2nd Shot At Baby Food False Ad Suit
Buyers of Gerber products asked the Ninth Circuit at a hearing Tuesday to revive their putative class action alleging the company labeled baby food with misleading nutritional information, saying a lower court erred in finding they hadn't presented enough evidence that they'd been deceived by the labels.
-
December 19, 2014
Gerber Fends Off Baby Food Labeling Suit
A California federal judge on Thursday threw out a proposed class action accusing Gerber Products Co. of misbranding baby food, citing a lack of evidence that sugar and nutrition claims on the products' labels actually deceived consumers.
-
January 17, 2014
Gerber Still Faces Nationwide Class Action Labeling Claims
A California federal judge on Wednesday pared a class action accusing Gerber Products Co. of breaching state labeling laws on its baby food products, but refused to ditch the nationwide class action claims, finding that Gerber had bitten off more than it could chew at this stage in the litigation.
-
September 09, 2013
Gerber Baby Food Labeling Suit Trimmed For Now
A California federal judge on Friday gutted a putative class action accusing Gerber Products Co. of misbranding baby food, ruling that the plaintiff hadn't shown that absent consumer class members were allegedly swindled the same way she was.
-
September 04, 2012
Gerber Urges Court To Toss Baby Food Mislabeling Suit
Gerber Products Co. and parent company Nestle USA Inc. asked a California federal court on Friday to throw out a putative class action accusing the companies of misbranding baby food, arguing that the claims are preempted by federal law and that the plaintiff could not show sufficient injury.