Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Black & Veatch Corporation v. Aspen Insurance (UK) LTD et al
Case Number:
2:12-cv-02350
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Sterchi
- Brown & James
- Butler Weihmuller
- Foran Glennon
- Franco Moroney
- Hall & Evans
- James Sobba
- Knight Nicastro
- Kuckelman Torline
- Kutak Rock
- Ogletree Deakins
- Pillsbury Winthrop
- Polsinelli PC
- Stueve Siegel
Companies
- Aspen Insurance Holdings Ltd.
- Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services Ltd.
- Black & Veatch
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Group
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 06, 2018
Insurers Look To End Power Plant Defect Coverage Battle
Two insurers for Black & Veatch Corp. on Friday urged a Kansas federal judge to rule they don't have to cover any costs the engineering company has incurred as a result of construction defects at four power plants, while Black & Veatch countered that the Tenth Circuit's recent ruling in the case established that the carriers must shell out.
-
February 08, 2016
Insurers Say Policy Wasn't Triggered By Power Plant Defects
Aspen Insurance UK Ltd. and a unit of Lloyd's of London asked a Kansas federal judge Monday to rule that a policy they issued to Black & Veatch Corp. doesn't cover construction blunders the company's contractors made at four power plants, claiming that Black & Veatch's other policies have to be exhausted first.
-
November 03, 2015
Black & Veatch Says Defects At Power Plants Are Covered
Construction company Black & Veatch Corp. told a Kansas federal judge on Tuesday that construction defects at four power plants constitute damage to a third party's property, satisfying its basic insuring agreement with two umbrella insurers in a $63 million damages row.
-
July 22, 2015
Insurers Denied Bid To Chop Black & Veatch's Claims By $44M
A Kansas federal judge on Wednesday denied two umbrella insurers' request to deduct $44 million from Black & Veatch Corp.'s $63 million damages claim in a dispute over coverage for construction defects in four power plants, but ordered the construction company to produce more documentation to support its claim.
-
February 03, 2015
Black & Veatch Settles With Insurer In Power Plant Defect Row
Construction company Black & Veatch Corp. has reached a settlement with Factory Mutual Insurance Co. in a dispute over coverage from construction defects in four power plants, according to documents filed in Kansas federal court on Tuesday.
-
June 06, 2012
Black & Veatch Sues Insurers Over AEP Power Plant Defects
Construction company Black & Veatch Corp. sued Aspen Insurance Ltd. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe Ltd. in Kansas federal court on Monday, alleging that the two insurers, which provided umbrella policies, improperly denied coverage for liabilities from construction defects in four power plants.