Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED v. HUSISIAN et al
Case Number:
1:12-cv-01819
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 26, 2013
Foley & Lardner Beats Conflict Suit Over Glycine Duties Case
A Washington, D.C., federal judge on Monday threw out GEO Specialty Chemicals Inc.'s allegations that Foley & Lardner LLP represented Chinese glycine companies in a dumping duties investigation that conflicted with its prior work for GEO, finding GEO hadn't shown the alleged conflict caused it any injury.
-
February 11, 2013
Foley Won't Be Barred From Work On Glycine Dumping Duties
A Washington, D.C., federal judge decided Friday not to block Foley & Lardner LLP from representing Chinese glycine companies in a duty investigation, despite a Foley attorney's prior work for GEO Specialty Chemicals Inc., a major U.S. glycine producer.
-
November 30, 2012
Judge Unlikely To Stop Foley From Glycine Duty Probe Work
A Washington federal judge said Friday he was unlikely to bar Foley & Lardner LLP from representing Chinese glycine companies in a duty investigation despite one of its attorney's prior representation of GEO Specialty Chemicals Inc. since the company's confidential material wouldn't be useful in the new case.
-
November 27, 2012
GEO Defends DC Venue In Bid To DQ Foley From Duty Probe
GEO Specialty Chemicals Inc. on Monday said a D.C. federal court was the proper venue to consider its bid to block Foley & Lardner LLP from representing Chinese glycine companies in a duty investigation because of a Foley attorney's prior representation of GEO.
-
November 20, 2012
Foley Says DQ Bid In Glycine Duty Probe Is In Wrong Venue
Foley & Lardner LLP said Monday that a D.C. federal court does not have jurisdiction to consider whether the firm's representation of Chinese glycine companies in a duty investigation conflicts with a Foley attorney's prior work for GEO Specialty Chemicals Inc.