Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Daniels v. Aeropostale West, Inc et al
Case Number:
3:12-cv-05755
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 10, 2014
Aeropostale OT Action Decertified After 'Worst-Ever' Deal
A California federal judge on Tuesday decertified a collective action consisting of nearly 600 Aeropostale Inc. employees who claimed the company had failed to timely pay their overtime wages, less than two weeks after blasting a proposed settlement between the parties as "one of the worst [he has] ever seen."
-
May 29, 2014
Judge Slams Aeropostale OT Deal As Among 'Worst Ever'
A California federal judge on Thursday rejected a proposed settlement between clothing retailer Aeropostale Inc. and nearly 600 employees who claimed the company failed to pay their overtime wages in a timely manner, calling the deal "one of the worst I've ever seen."
-
April 25, 2013
Aeropostale Workers Win Conditional Cert. In OT Suit
A California federal judge on Wednesday conditionally certified a collective action alleging clothing retailer Aeropostale Inc. failed to pay overtime to thousands of store employees in a timely manner, finding the plaintiff had presented sufficient evidence of a uniform, nationwide policy that violated the Fair Labor Standards Act.