Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
MAJDIPOUR v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLC
Case Number:
2:12-cv-07849
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 14, 2019
Land Rover Drivers Get OK For $6.7M Deal In Suspension Suit
A New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday signed off on a $6.7 million deal in a putative class action against Jaguar Land Rover over allegedly defective suspension systems, saying the revised agreement satisfied his concerns about the original settlement in the case.
-
April 10, 2019
Land Rover Drivers Again Push $6M Deal In Suspension Row
A putative class of drivers renewed their bid for a settlement with Jaguar Land Rover over defective suspension systems, arguing in New Jersey federal court Tuesday that the court misunderstood the replacement costs when it rejected a proposed $6.2 million deal that it deemed "unusually low."
-
April 04, 2018
Judge Rejects $6.2M Land Rover Deal As Unfair To Drivers
A New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday declined to grant preliminary approval to a roughly $6.2 million settlement between Land Rover and drivers who claimed their suspension systems were defective, saying the amount seems "unusually low" and leaves some drivers with nothing.
-
March 19, 2015
Jaguar Faces Leaner Suit Over Range Rover Defect
A New Jersey federal judge on Wednesday pared claims in a putative class action alleging Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC manufactured and sold Range Rover vehicles equipped with defective electronic air suspension systems, refusing to toss the common-law claims but cutting consumer protection claims as time-barred.
-
October 10, 2013
Jaguar Gets Range Rover Suspension Defect Suit Pared
A New Jersey federal judge on Wednesday trimmed a proposed class action alleging Jaguar Land Rover Automotive PLC manufactured and sold defective electronic air suspension systems in some Range Rover sport utility vehicles that could dangerously unbalance the suspensions.