Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
May 01, 2013
Radware, LTD. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc.
Case Number:
5:13-cv-02021
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Gibson Dunn
- Hogan Lovells
- Irell & Manella
- Latham & Watkins
- Polsinelli PC
- Ruttenberg IP Law
- Sawyer & Labar
- Willkie Farr
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
May 02, 2014
Network Cos. Say Radware Load-Balance Patents Invalid
Two computer networking companies urged a California federal judge on Friday to throw out Radware Ltd.'s lawsuits accusing them of infringing three patents on network load balancing, arguing that the patents are invalid because their language improperly mixes patent claims or is unclear.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login