Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Rahman v. Mott's LLP et al
Case Number:
3:13-cv-03482
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 04, 2014
Mott's Fends Off Class Cert. In Apple Juice False-Ad Row
A California federal judge denied certification to a proposed class alleging that Mott's LLP mislabeled its apple juice, ruling Wednesday that the plaintiff failed to say why certifying a liability-only class would be more efficient or desirable.
-
October 15, 2014
Judge Plucks Mott's 'No Sugar Added' Class Action Claims
A California federal judge on Wednesday pared a bulk of the claims from a proposed class action alleging Mott's LLP mislabeled its apple juice but ruled a trial should determine whether the plaintiff had relied on the juice's "no sugar added" label.
-
April 09, 2014
Mott's Can't Squeeze 'No Sugar Added' Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday rejected Mott's LLP's bid to toss a proposed class action alleging its apple products are improperly labeled as having "no sugar added," finding the plaintiffs thus far have shown that a reasonable consumer could be deceived.
-
January 30, 2014
Mott's Gets 'No Sugar Added' Labeling Claims Cut Down
A California federal judge on Wednesday trimmed from a proposed class action claims alleging Mott's LLP's applesauce products are improperly labeled as having "no sugar added," but let stand similar claims concerning the company's apple juice.