Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
1:13-md-02472
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Adler Pollock
- Bartlit Beck
- Berger Montague
- Blish & Cavanagh
- Cohen Milstein
- DarrowEverett
- Doyle Lowther
- Duffy & Sweeney
- Dugan Law Firm
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Foley & Lardner
- FrancoLaw PLLC
- Hach Rose Schirripa
- Hagens Berman
- Hangley Aronchick
- Hilliard & Shadowen
- Kessler Topaz
- Lowenstein Sandler
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Lynch & Pine
- Mancini Carter
- Miller Shah LLP
- Motley Rice
- NastLaw
- Partridge Snow
- Pomerantz LLP
- Radice Law Firm
- Skadden Arps
- Skiermont Derby
- Spector Roseman
- Stranch Jennings
- White & Case
- Wilkinson Stekloff
Companies
- Ahold Delhaize
- Allergan PLC
- CVS Health Corp.
- Fraternal Order of Police
- Health Care Service Corp.
- H‑E‑B LP
- Lupin Ltd.
- Rite Aid Corp.
- Rochester Drug Cooperative Inc.
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
- The Kroger Co.
- United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
- Warner Chilcott Limited
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 14, 2016
Warner Chilcott Wants 'Shotgun' Antitrust Claims Tossed
Warner Chilcott PLC on Monday asked a Rhode Island federal court to dismiss revived claims that it paid drugmakers to delay producing a generic version of its contraceptive Loestrin in multidistrict litigation, saying the “kitchen sink” of antitrust allegations suffers from fatal deficiencies.
-
February 18, 2015
Loestrin Buyers Teed Up For Appeal In Pay-For-Delay Suit
A Rhode Island judge on Tuesday cleared the way for Loestrin buyers to appeal the dismissal of their pay-for-delay claims against Warner Chilcott PLC, which would see another circuit court forced to decide whether patent settlements must include cash payments to face antitrust scrutiny.
-
September 04, 2014
Loestrin Pay-For-Delay Case Can't Survive Actavis, Judge Says
A Rhode Island federal judge tossed all claims in multidistrict litigation that Warner Chilcott PLC and two others entered illegal agreements to delay generic versions of Loestrin, saying his decision "was not an easy one" but the deals didn't include cash payments as specified in the U.S. Supreme Court's Actavis ruling.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next →