Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
IN RE: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
Case Number:
0:14-md-02522
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Armstrong Teasdale
- Berger Montague
- Chestnut Cambronne
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Dykema
- Faegre Drinker
- Friday Eldredge
- Hartline Barger
- Hausfeld LLP
- Heins Mills
- Hinckley Allen
- Lightfoot Franklin
- Lockridge Grindal
- Lugenbuhl Wheaton
- Milberg Coleman
- Morrison Foerster
- Orrick Herrington
- Reinhardt Wendorf
- Reinhart Boerner
- Robbins LLP
- Robinson & Cole
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 09, 2015
Target Can't Stifle Banks' Experts In Breach MDL
Target Corp. struck out Tuesday in its effort to exclude expert testimony from multidistrict litigation brought by banks whose customers' payment information was stolen in the company's 2013 data breach, after a Minnesota federal judge ruled that Target's criticisms were premature.
-
August 21, 2015
Banks Detail Target Security Lapses In Class Cert. Bid
The bid for class certification by financial institutions suing Target Corp. in multidistrict litigation over the retailer's massive 2013 data breach was unsealed on Thursday, as some banks are apparently still disputing a $67 million settlement agreement with Visa Inc. announced earlier this week.
-
August 07, 2015
Target Calls Banks' Breach Claims Too Distinct For Class Cert.
Target Corp. asked a Minnesota federal judge Thursday to deny a group of financial institutions' request for class certification in multidistrict litigation over the retailer's massive 2013 data breach, arguing that too many individual issues predominate the class to warrant certification.
-
August 07, 2015
Target Says Unsealing Breach Docs Invites Another Attack
Target Corp. told a Minnesota federal judge Thursday that banks seeking to hold it accountable for losses they suffered after the retailer was hit by a massive data breach in 2013 shouldn't be allowed to unseal documents detailing Target's cybersecurity protocols because the company would be more vulnerable to another attack.
-
July 30, 2015
Target Data Breach Deal Objector Blasts Attys' 40 Percent Cut
An objector to a proposed $10 million deal to let Target Corp. out of multidistrict litigation over a notorious 2013 data breach told a Minnesota federal court Thursday the settlement pays far too much — 40 percent of the total settlement amount — to the attorneys who arranged the deal.
-
July 01, 2015
Banks Seek Class Cert. In Target Data Breach MDL
Financial institutions suing Target Corp. in multidistrict litigation over the retailer's massive 2013 data breach urged a Minnesota federal judge on Wednesday to grant them class certification amid a settlement that some apparently are still disputing.
-
May 28, 2015
Target Must Reveal Info On Past Data Breaches, Judge Says
Target Corp. has to tell financial institutions suing over the retailer's massive 2013 data breach whether it suffered similar attacks in the past and if so, how it responded to them, a Minnesota federal judge ruled in the multidistrict litigation Wednesday.
-
May 22, 2015
MasterCard, Target Fall Short On Data Breach Settlement
MasterCard Inc. and Target Corp. didn't get enough banks to sign onto a $19 million payout to settle a proposed class action in Minnesota federal court as part of larger multidistrict litigation over a massive 2013 breach of Target customers' credit card data, Target said Friday.
-
May 07, 2015
Banks Lose Bid To Stop Target's $19M Data Breach Deal
The Minnesota federal judge overseeing multidistrict litigation over Target Corp.'s 2013 data breach nixed an attempt by financial institutions to halt the retailer's $19 million settlement with MasterCard Inc., saying Thursday that he has little authority over the deal even though it may fail the smell test.
-
April 27, 2015
Target Defends $19M Data Breach Deal With MasterCard
Target Corp. on Friday slammed a bid by banks and credit unions to block its proposed $19 million settlement with MasterCard Inc. over the retailer's 2013 data breach, arguing that there isn't anything "remotely unlawful" about the settlement because MasterCard issuers can decide whether to opt in.