Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re: Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
1:14-md-02542
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Stinson LLP
- Ahern & Associates
- Arthur N. Bailey & Associates
- McGuireWoods
- Steven Williams Law
- Motley Rice
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Bartko LLP
- Lovelace & Associates PA
- K&L Gates
- Gross & Belsky
- Robbins Geller
- Alston & Bird
- Winston & Strawn
- Girard Sharp
- Wolf Popper
- Segal McCambridge
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- Saxena White
- Butler Snow LLP
- Cotchett Pitre
- Garwin Gerstein
- Orrick Herrington
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Spiro Harrison
- Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko
- Wolf Haldenstein
- McKool Smith
- Bartko Zankel
- Kaplan Fox
- Mehri & Skalet
- Harrington Ocko
- Miller Shah LLP
- Morgan Lewis
- Pomerantz LLP
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Pritzker Levine
- Butzel Long
- Lockridge Grindal
- Polsinelli PC
- Hunton Andrews
- Duane Morris
- Robins Kaplan
- Cadwalader Wickersham
- Berman Tabacco
- Pearson Warshaw
- Nussbaum Law Group
- Buchanan Ingersoll
- Nelson Mullins
- Skadden Arps
- Gustafson Gluek
- Jones Foster
- Quarles & Brady
- Scott&Scott
- Mitchell Williams
- Jaeckle Fleischmann
- Gainey McKenna
- Jones Day
- Taus Cebulash
- Paul Weiss
- Lowey Dannenberg
- Weinstein Kitchenoff
- Kehoe Law
- Zaremba Brown
- Oliver Bell Group
- Dan Johnson Law Group
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Mayer Brown
Companies
- Peet’s Coffee Inc.
- R.C. Bigelow Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Compass Group PLC
- Walmart Inc.
- Flint Group SA
- Starbucks Corp.
- Essendant Inc.
- Costco Wholesale Corp.
- Community Coffee Co. LLC
- Costco
- Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
- Nestle SA
- Bay Valley Foods LLC
- Wakefern Food Corp.
- McLane Co. Inc.
- Bi-Lo
- BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings Inc.
- TreeHouse Foods Inc.
- The ODP Corp.
- Compass Minerals International, Inc.
- Dunkin' Brands Group Inc.
- Unilever PLC
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 14, 2023
Keurig Says Winn-Dixie, BJ's Shelves Show Pod Competition
Keurig Inc. asked a New York federal judge to toss antitrust claims by Winn-Dixie Stores Inc. and BJ's Wholesale Club Inc. from a broader consolidated multidistrict litigation, arguing the retailers' own shelves show plenty of competition for coffee pods, rather than a Keurig monopoly.
-
May 23, 2023
Keurig Wants To Toss Winn-Dixie Claims On Top Of Sanctions
A New York federal magistrate judge did not go far enough in ordering sanctions against grocer Winn-Dixie for failing to meet discovery obligations, the coffee machine maker Keurig Inc. says, and should also recommend that Winn-Dixie's claims that Keurig overcharged for coffee pods be immediately dismissed.
-
May 09, 2023
Winn-Dixie Sanctioned For Keurig MDL Discovery Failures
A New York federal magistrate judge ordered sanctions against grocer Winn-Dixie for having "repeatedly and consciously failed" to meet discovery obligations for claims against Keurig, amid long-running multidistrict litigation accusing the coffee giant of anti-competitively cutting out rivals with exclusive dealings and exclusionary product design.
-
January 26, 2022
Shkreli Ruling Pokes Holes In Keurig Defense, Rivals Say
Keurig's coffee competitors have told a New York federal judge that Martin Shkreli's recent $64.6 million loss in a pharmaceutical antitrust case underscores why Keurig should face liability for monopoly conduct.
-
June 08, 2021
Class Counsel Awarded $10M In Fees From $31M Keurig Deal
A New York federal judge signed off Monday on a $10.3 million attorney fees award, plus $2.3 million in litigation costs, for plaintiff firms that negotiated a $31 million antitrust settlement with Keurig Green Mountain Inc. resolving claims the coffee giant monopolized the market for single-serve coffee packs.
-
June 03, 2021
Fla., Ill. Win Concessions In $31M Keurig Brew Pod Settlement
Florida and Illinois claimants in a $31 million settlement with Keurig over coffee pod prices will get equal treatment with other states that have passed laws allowing indirect purchasers to recover antitrust damages, according to a plan filed in New York federal court.
-
May 10, 2021
Class Counsel Seek $10.3M In Fees From $31M Keurig Deal
Counsel for indirect purchasers who secured a $31 million settlement last year with Keurig Green Mountain Inc. over allegations that it monopolizes the market for single-serve coffee packs have requested $12.6 million to cover their fees and expenses.
-
April 14, 2021
Ill., Fla. AGs Can Intervene Over 'Unfair' $31M Keurig Deal
A New York federal court has allowed the attorneys general of Illinois and Florida to object to the method of distributing a $31 million settlement to residents of their states in a case accusing Keurig Inc. of monopolizing the market for single-serve coffee pods.
-
March 01, 2021
Ill., Fla. AGs Look To Intervene Over 'Unfair' $31M Keurig Deal
The attorneys general of Illinois and Florida say their residents were unfairly singled out to receive a third of what's available to other state residents under a $31 million settlement with Keurig Inc., even though they, like the other states, repealed a federal prohibition on antitrust damages claims.
-
September 30, 2020
Keurig To Pay $31M To Grind Indirect Buyers' Antitrust Claims
Keurig Inc. has agreed to pay $31 million to end claims from a putative class of indirect purchasers accusing it of monopolizing the market for single-serve coffee packs, according to a bid for preliminary approval of the deal filed Wednesday in New York federal court.