Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Health Alliance Plan of Michigan et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company
Case Number:
2:14-cv-13788
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bodman PLC
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Hickey Hauck
- Honigman LLP
- Hunton Andrews
- McDonald Hopkins
- Miller Canfield
- Wolfson Bolton
Companies
- Aetna Inc.
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Inc.
- Health Alliance Plan of Michigan
- Henry Ford Health System
- PHC Inc.
- The Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 03, 2017
Blue Cross Gets Hospital Contracts Antitrust Suit Trimmed
A Michigan federal judge on Friday partially dismissed a suit accusing Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan of paying hospitals to raise prices for rival insurers because it was filed too late, but allowed Sherman Act and state antitrust law claims to survive.
-
September 29, 2015
Honigman Beats DQ Bid In Blue Cross Antitrust Suit
Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP on Tuesday beat a bid to disqualify it from antitrust litigation against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan when a federal judge ruled it can remain on the case if it seeks consent from all of its clients involved in prior cases against the insurer.
-
November 24, 2014
Honigman Says Blue Cross DQ Motion Is 'Baseless'
Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP told a Michigan federal court Friday that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan's bid to get the firm booted from antitrust litigation against the insurer is "completely baseless" and denied that its loyalties are divided between clients with adverse claims.
-
October 24, 2014
Blue Cross Rips Honigman's 'Dual Role' In Antitrust Suit
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan said Thursday that Honigman Miller Schwartz & Cohn LLP should be disqualified from representing three health insurers in a suit alleging Blue Cross violated antitrust laws in its contracts with hospitals, saying the firm took on "overlapping and conflicting" roles.