Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In Re Uber FCRA Litigation
Case Number:
3:14-cv-05200
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Audet & Partners
- Constangy Brooks
- Gibson Dunn
- Goldstein Borgen
- Littler Mendelson
- PK Schrieffer
- Setareh Law Group
- Seyfarth Shaw
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 09, 2015
Uber Looks To Arbitrate Driver's Background Check Claims
Uber Technologies Inc. wants a suit lodged by a Boston cab driver in California federal court sent to arbitration, saying on Friday his proposed class action alleging the company violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act by running background checks without authorization was barred by an agreement the driver signed with the car service.
-
November 25, 2014
Driver Accuses Uber Of Illegally Checking Backgrounds
A Boston cabdriver hit Uber Technologies with a proposed class action on Monday, alleging that the mobile app-based car service routinely violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act by using background checks without applicants' knowledge or authorization to make hiring decisions.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →