Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
State of Texas et al v. United States of America et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-00254
Court:
Nature of Suit:
899(Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision)
Judge:
Firms
- Altshuler Berzon
- American Center for Law & Justice Inc.
- Barnes & Thornburg
- DLA Piper
- Fogler Brar
- Garcia & Garcia Attorneys at Law
- Hughes Socol
- Lehotsky Keller
- Locke Lord
Companies
- Cato Institute
- Immigration Reform Law Institute
- Judicial Watch Inc.
- Service Employees International Union
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 26, 2015
White House Eyeing Scope Of Texas Immigration Ruling: Rep.
The White House is looking into whether a Texas court decision blocking the president's new immigration policies applies to all 50 states, an Illinois congressman said Wednesday, just days after the Obama administration asked the district court to stay the ruling.
-
February 26, 2015
Judicial Watch Argues Against Stay In Immigration Action
Judicial Watch Inc. on Wednesday waded into a 26-state challenge to new immigration policies laid out in the president's executive actions, pressing a Texas federal judge to deny the government's bid to lift a temporary block on the policies and preserve the status quo.
-
February 24, 2015
States Get More Time For Immigration Policy Stay Response
A Texas federal judge on Tuesday said that 26 states challenging new immigration policies created by the president's executive actions have about a week to respond to the federal government's request for an emergency stay of an injunction blocking the policies from taking effect instead of a swifter time frame suggested by the government.
-
February 23, 2015
DOJ Seeks Emergency Stay Of Block On Immigration Policies
The federal government on Monday asked a Texas district court for an emergency stay on its decision to temporarily block new immigration policies created by the president's executive actions and officially kicked off its appeal of the order to the Fifth Circuit.
-
February 20, 2015
Obama To Seek Stay Of Order Blocking Immigration Policies
The White House said Friday that the U.S. Department of Justice will seek a stay of a Texas federal judge's decision to halt new immigration policies created by the president's executive actions, with the department slated to file for the stay no later than Monday.
-
February 18, 2015
Texas Pols Vow Continued Fight Against Immigration Actions
Texas political leaders on Wednesday vowed to continue fighting President Barack Obama's immigration executive actions, saying they believe appellate courts will uphold a federal judge's preliminary injunction blocking deferred deportation policies from taking effect.
-
February 17, 2015
DOJ To Appeal Texas Court's Halt Of Immigration Policies
White House and U.S. Department of Justice officials vowed Tuesday that the federal government will appeal a Texas federal court's decision to temporarily block new immigration policies created by the president's executive actions, although the timeline of the federal government's challenge is still unclear.
-
February 17, 2015
States Win Bid To Block Obama's Immigration Actions
A Texas federal court on Monday sided with 26 states and temporarily halted new deferred deportation policies created by President Barack Obama's executive actions, just days before some of the changes were slated to go into effect.
-
February 12, 2015
Three Immigrants Can't Intervene In Executive Actions Suit
The Texas federal judge overseeing 26 states' challenge to new immigration policies created by President Barack Obama's recent executive actions rejected a bid by three undocumented immigrants to intervene in the suit on Wednesday, although he did allow the women to be heard as amici curiae, or friends of the court.
-
February 09, 2015
Immigrants Push To Intervene In States' Executive Action Suit
Three immigrants without lawful status fired back Friday at arguments against their request to intervene in 26 states' case over the president's executive actions, claiming the federal government can't adequately represent their interests, because it's more invested in promoting enforcement efficiency.