Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Le et al v. Zuffa, LLC
Case Number:
2:15-cv-01045
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Berger Montague
- Boies Schiller
- Campbell & Williams
- Clark Hill
- Cohen Milstein
- Greenberg Traurig
- Jones Lovelock
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kellogg Hansen
- Kemp Jones
- Kendall Brill & Kelly
- King & Spalding
- Latham & Watkins
- Law Office of Frederick S. Schwartz
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Paul Weiss
- Radice Law Firm
- Schneider Wallace
- Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky LLP
- Snell & Wilmer
- Sparacino PLLC
- Spector Roseman
- Warner Angle
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 13, 2019
UFC, Fighters Trade Blows Ahead Of Class Cert. Decision
The Ultimate Fighting Championship and fighters suing it over an anti-competitive "scheme" that allegedly keeps their earnings low have just traded some of the most important blows in the potentially multibillion-dollar case, with each side trying to knock out the other's experts ahead of a class certification decision.
-
September 24, 2018
Fighters Say They Can Prove UFC Depressed Their Wages
A proposed class of mixed martial arts fighters told a Nevada federal court Friday that they have proof the Ultimate Fighting Championship's parent company pushed out competitors and depressed their wages, and that their antitrust suit should proceed.
-
July 31, 2018
UFC Seeks To Knock Out Fighters' Antitrust Class Action
UFC's parent company urged a Nevada federal court Monday to end an antitrust suit lodged by a proposed class of mixed martial arts fighters who accuse the organization of pushing out rival promoters and stifling wages, saying fighters' wages are increasing and there's no evidence that competitors are being shut out.
-
February 20, 2018
UFC Fighters Aim For Class Cert. In Antitrust Battle
Mixed martial arts fighters urged a Nevada federal judge Friday to grant class certification in a lawsuit claiming UFC's parent company stifled wages and blocked rivals in the market using an anti-competitive scheme, saying they can prove that the impact of the organization's actions was widespread and damaging.
-
July 17, 2017
UFC Blasts Emergency Doc Bid In Fighters' Antitrust Suit
The UFC urged a Nevada federal court Friday to reject a bid by mixed martial arts fighters to force the production of purportedly privileged documents in an antitrust suit against the organization, arguing it has already reviewed thousands of documents at the fighters' request.
-
June 14, 2017
UFC Rival Must Hand Over Info In Fighter Antitrust Suit
A Nevada federal magistrate judge overseeing an antitrust lawsuit by mixed martial arts fighters against the UFC told MMA promoter and UFC rival Bellator Sport Worldwide LLC on Tuesday to respond to subpoenas by the parties, but limited the scope of their requests to fighter contracts and financial information.
-
May 25, 2017
UFC Says Fighters Already Have Text Messages They Seek
The UFC on Wednesday hit back at a request by mixed martial arts fighters to turn over text messages from cellphones used by owner Dana White in their lawsuit accusing the organization of illegally dominating the sport, saying the fighters are asking for information they already have.
-
April 21, 2017
MMA Fighters Ask Court To Reschedule UFC Execs' Depos
Mixed martial arts fighters accusing the UFC of illegally dominating the sport asked a Nevada federal judge to reschedule its depositions with two executives at the organization, arguing Friday that they can't conduct depositions of the UFC's former chief legal officer and current chief operating officer on such short notice.
-
March 27, 2017
MMA Fighter Says UFC Antitrust Claims Not Too Late
Mixed martial arts fighters accusing the UFC of illegally dominating the sport asked a Nevada federal judge to deny the organization's bid to escape one of the fighter's claims, arguing Friday that they are not time-barred given the fact the UFC's antitrust violations continue.
-
February 14, 2017
UFC Can't Shield Docs In MMA Fighters' Monopoly Suit
UFC for the most part cannot assert attorney-client privilege over two sets of documents involving contract and merchandising negotiations in a proposed class action filed by mixed martial arts fighters alleging the organization is illegally dominating the sport, a Nevada federal magistrate judge ruled Monday.