Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
CUCCINELLO et al v. UBER, INC et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-06604
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
October 24, 2016
Uber Settles FCRA Suit Over Employee Screening Methods
A New Jersey federal judge on Monday administratively dismissed a putative class action accusing Uber and background check company Hirease Inc. of violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act by conducting unlawful checks, noting that the companies have agreed to settle the suit filed by Uber job applicants.
-
January 05, 2016
Background Check Co. Again Asks To Be Free From Uber Suit
Hirease Inc. told a New Jersey federal court Monday that it had no obligation to tell job applicants about background checks it conducted on them for Uber and that it should be dropped from a suit by those who were rejected as drivers.
-
November 16, 2015
Uber Seeks To Nix 'Duplicative' Background Check Suit
Uber wants out of a proposed class action in New Jersey federal court, on Saturday calling it a purely duplicative rehash of other lawsuits also accusing the company of failing the disclosure requirements for would-be drivers subjected to background checks.
-
November 12, 2015
Background Check Co. Wants Out Of Uber Applicants' Suit
A company that runs background checks on job applicants urged a New Jersey federal judge Wednesday to drop it from a putative class action by drivers who were rejected by Uber after allegedly unlawful checks, saying it's Uber's job to properly secure permission to check applicants' histories.
-
September 03, 2015
Uber Hit With FCRA Suit Over Employee Screening Methods
Uber Inc. and a contractor were hit on Thursday with a proposed class action in New Jersey federal court that alleges their employment screening practices deny applicants the chance to dispute the information and force them to sign forms with language that limits their rights in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.