Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
MARTINEZ v. TD BANK USA, N.A.
Case Number:
1:15-cv-07712
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 03, 2017
Class Claims Tossed From TD Bank, Target Robocall Suit
Only one claim remains in a consumer's suit against TD Bank and Target over unsolicited phone calls after a New Jersey federal judge recently struck the class allegations and ruled the Telephone Consumer Protection Act claim should be tossed as the consumer hadn't properly revoked her consent to receive the calls.
-
December 22, 2016
TD Bank, Target Trim Robocall Suit, But Not Calif. Claim
TD Bank and Target may have put a dent in a putative class action over repeated unsolicited phone calls to customers, but according to a New Jersey federal court ruling Tuesday, they could not defeat a consumer's claim for violating a California debt collection law at the dismissal stage.
-
October 27, 2015
TD Bank Sued Over Robocalls
TD Bank USA NA was hit with a putative class action in New Jersey federal court on Monday, alleging that the bank repeatedly calls account holders, sometimes up to 10 times a day, in violation of federal consumer protection laws.