Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Amy Joseph v. Trader Joes Company
Case Number:
2:16-cv-01371
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Audet & Partners
- Baron & Budd
- Buchanan Ingersoll
- Bursor & Fisher
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Del Mar Law Group
- Parks & Solar
- SKT Law PC
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 15, 2020
Trader Joe's $1.3M Deal Gets Nod In Underfilled Tuna Can Suit
A California federal judge has given preliminary approval to a $1.3 million settlement intended to end a proposed class action accusing grocery retailer Trader Joe's of underfilling 5-ounce cans of tuna, saying a Ninth Circuit decision last year allows the case to apply California law nationwide.
-
April 01, 2019
Deal Denied For Trader Joe's Tuna Buyers Over Cert. Claims
A California federal judge on Monday denied preliminary approval of a $1.3 million settlement between Trader Joe's and a group of tuna buyers in a proposed class action alleging the retailer underfilled certain cans of tuna, saying the buyers haven't justified applying California law to a nationwide class.
-
September 17, 2018
Trader Joe's Settles Underfilled Tuna Can Suit For $1.3M
Trader Joe's has agreed to settle for $1.3 million a proposed class action in California federal court from customers claiming the retailer underfilled 5-ounce tuna cans.
-
November 13, 2017
Trader Joe's Hits Back Again At Underfilled Tuna Claims
Trader Joe's Co. has refused to back down in California federal court from its defense that it doesn't underfill the cans of tuna fish it sells, denying once again a proposed consumer class suit's allegations that accuse the grocer of underfilling 5-ounce cans of store-brand tuna.
-
October 05, 2017
Trader Joe's Still Can't Escape Underfilled Tuna Suit
A California federal judge on Tuesday refused to toss the bulk of a proposed class action accusing Trader Joe's Co. of underfilling cans of tuna, saying the discount grocery chain was not covered by a special FDA permit freeing it from certain labeling requirements at the time the consumers' allegations were made.
-
July 31, 2017
Trader Joe's Again Seeks To Toss Underfilled Tuna Suit
Trader Joe's Co. on Friday sought once again to throw out a proposed class action in California federal court accusing it of deceiving consumers by underfilling cans of tuna, saying the suit relies on an outdated federal regulation determining fill standards for canned tuna.
-
June 02, 2017
Trader Joe's Wins Toss Of Tuna Can-Underfilling Claims
Trader Joe's cut and run from a suit accusing the grocer of underfilling its cans of tuna when a California federal judge granted a motion to dismiss Friday, finding the customers had improperly made claims under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
-
April 11, 2017
Trader Joe's Can't Dodge Tuna Can Claims, Consumers Say
Consumers accusing Trader Joe's of underfilling tuna cans urged a California federal judge Monday not to toss their proposed class action, contending that the same arguments for dismissal raised by the grocery store chain have been rejected in similar suits.
-
March 22, 2017
Trader Joe's Wants Tuna Class Suit Canned
Grocery store chain Trader Joe's Co. urged a California federal judge Tuesday to dismiss a proposed consumer class action accusing it of underfilling tuna cans, arguing that the consumers' stated claims are overshadowed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's standard for what a "reasonable consumer" understands about food labeling.
-
November 15, 2016
Bursor & Fisher Hit Back At Rival Firms In Tuna Class Suit
Law firm Bursor & Fisher defended its ability to head up the consolidated litigation accusing Trader Joe's of underfilling tuna cans on Monday, as lawyers leading the class actions continue to spar in California federal court over who should take on the role as sole interim counsel.