Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Microsoft Corporation v. United States Department of Justice et al
Case Number:
2:16-cv-00538
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Arete Law Group
- Corr Cronin
- Covington & Burling
- Davis Wright Tremaine
- DLA Piper
- Focal PLLC
- Gibson Dunn
- Hogan Lovells
- Lane Powell
- Lowe Graham
- Mayer Brown
- Orrick Herrington
- Perkins Coie
- Summit Law Group
- Yarmuth LLP
Companies
- Amazon.com Inc.
- American Civil Liberties Union
- Apple Inc.
- Association of American Publishers
- AvePoint Inc.
- Cisco Systems Inc.
- Delta Air Lines Inc.
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Eli Lilly & Co.
- Fox News Network LLC
- Google LLC
- H5 Inc.
- LinkedIn Corp.
- Microsoft Corp.
- National Public Radio Inc.
- Pinterest Inc.
- Snap Inc.
- The McClatchy Company
- The Seattle Times
- Twilio Inc.
- Twitter Inc.
- Wipfli LLP
- Yahoo Inc.
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 26, 2016
ACLU Wants Piece Of Microsoft Fight Over Gov't Gag Orders
The American Civil Liberties Union on Thursday asked a Washington state federal court for permission to join Microsoft’s challenge to the constitutionality of gag orders that prevent service providers from telling their customers about law enforcement demands for access to user data, arguing that this may be the group's only opportunity to mount such a fight.
-
April 15, 2016
Microsoft Faces Long Odds In Fight Against Gov't Gag Orders
Microsoft faces an uphill battle in its fight to strike down the government's ability to prevent the service provider from telling its customers about law enforcement demands to access user data, but the company's argument that the government can't force it to keep customers in the dark forever may find some traction, attorneys say.
-
April 14, 2016
Microsoft Fights Gag Orders On Warrants For Customers' Data
Microsoft is hitting back at the government's ability to force the service provider to keep its customers in the dark about law enforcement demands to access user data, filing a suit Thursday in Washington state federal court arguing that the practice is unconstitutional.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →