Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Amador County, California v. DOI, et al
Case Number:
16-5082
Court:
Nature of Suit:
-
January 04, 2018
DC Circ. Won't Rethink Nix Of Calif. County's Casino Suit
The D.C. Circuit on Wednesday said it won't reconsider a panel ruling backing the dismissal of a California county's suit challenging a U.S. Department of the Interior decision supporting a proposed tribal casino.
-
November 28, 2017
DC Circ. Backs Toss Of Calif. County's Tribal Casino Fight
The D.C. Circuit on Monday backed a lower court's decision to toss a California county's suit challenging a U.S. Department of the Interior decision supporting a proposed tribal casino, saying the tribe and the county agreed in a 1987 deal that the tribe would be treated as a federally recognized reservation.
-
May 19, 2017
Calif. County Says Deal With Tribe Doesn't Block Casino Suit
A California county pressed the D.C. Circuit on Thursday to allow it to challenge a U.S. Department of the Interior decision supporting a proposed tribal casino, saying a 1987 deal between the county and the tribe didn't waive the county's right to challenge the legality of the tribe's gaming plans.
-
February 15, 2017
Calif. County Can Fight Tribal Casino, DC Circ. Told
A California county has urged the D.C. Circuit to allow it to challenge a U.S. Department of the Interior decision backing a proposed tribal casino, arguing that it had retained the right to oppose the project.