Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In re: Arizona Theranos Incorporated Litigation
Case Number:
2:16-cv-02138
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Boies Schiller
- Cooley LLP
- Dickinson Wright
- Gibbs Law Group
- Girard Sharp
- Hagens Berman
- Kaplan Fox
- Keller Rohrback
- Lewis Roca
- Lieff Cabraser
- Orrick Herrington
- Papetti Samuels
- Paynter Law Firm
- Sidley Austin
- Snell & Wilmer
- Statecraft PLLC
- Weil Gotshal
- Wilkinson Stekloff
- WilmerHale
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 11, 2017
Theranos Seeks Out Of Blood-Testing Suits
Beleaguered blood-testing startup Theranos on Tuesday pushed an Arizona federal judge to throw out consolidated proposed class actions claiming it and Walgreen Co. conspired to mislead consumers about the accuracy of Theranos' tests, saying the consumers only allege the companies were business partners.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →