Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Michael v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:16-cv-07238
Court:
Nature of Suit:
470(Racketeer/Corrupt Organization)
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 03, 2017
Citigroup Beats RICO Suit Over Property Inspections
An Illinois federal judge on Monday tossed a racketeering suit brought against Citigroup Inc.'s mortgage unit by a proposed class of borrowers claiming the bank inappropriately charged them with property inspection fees, finding that the plaintiffs failed to allege compliance with Citi's contractual policies.
-
October 14, 2016
Citigroup Wants RICO Suit Over Property Inspections Tossed
Citigroup Inc.’s mortgage unit told an Illinois federal judge on Thursday to toss a proposed class action brought by borrowers claiming the bank inappropriately charged them with property inspection fees, saying the complaint reads more like a contract dispute than a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act claim.
-
July 15, 2016
Citigroup Unit Hit With RICO Suit Over Property Inspections
Citigroup Inc.'s mortgage unit and a contractor violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act by inappropriately inspecting the properties of people who fell behind on their mortgages and then charging fees related to those inspections, according to a putative class action filed Thursday in Illinois federal court.