Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Congdon et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
4:16-cv-02499
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 03, 2019
Attys For 'Eviscerated' Uber Driver Class Win $1.2M In Fees
Uber owes $1.2 million in attorney fees after an "eviscerated" class of drivers prevailed in their suit accusing the company of taking safety fees out of their fares, a California federal judge ordered, far short of the $3.3 million the drivers' counsel asked for.
-
November 20, 2018
Attys For 'Eviscerated' Uber Driver Class Seek Fare-Suit Fees
Attorneys for a putative class of hundreds of thousands of Uber drivers that was slashed to a certified class of 9,600 because of a Ninth Circuit decision in another case against the company argued Monday for more than $3.3 million in fees for their $1.9 million win.
-
June 14, 2018
Uber Drivers Denied Punitives In 'Safe Rides Fee' Row
A certified class of drivers alleging Uber improperly took a cut of their fares by instituting a $1 "safe rides fee" cannot collect punitive damages on their breach of contract claim against the ride-hailing giant, a California federal judge ruled Wednesday.
-
May 09, 2018
Uber Slams Drivers' Push For Punitives In 'Safe Ride Fee' Row
Uber Technologies Inc. fired back Tuesday at a certified class of drivers seeking to delve into the ride-hailing giant's financials to support their bid for punitive damages, in a suit alleging Uber improperly took a cut of drivers' fares by instituting a $1 "safe rides fee."
-
April 09, 2018
Uber Drivers Push For Punitives In 'Safe Ride Fee' Row
A certified class of drivers accusing Uber Technologies Inc. of improperly taking a cut of their fares by instituting a $1 "safe rides fee" moved Friday to seek punitive damages against the company and slammed Uber's attempt to split off that portion of the case.
-
March 08, 2018
Uber Drivers Get Cert. And Win In Safe Ride Fee Row
A California federal judge Thursday handed a win to a group of Uber Technologies Inc. drivers who say their contract was breached through the overcharging of a $1 "safe ride" fee.
-
October 31, 2017
Judge Slams Uber's 'Bad Contract' In Safe Rides Fee Row
A California federal judge appeared open Tuesday to granting a quick win to a putative class of Uber drivers who claim the ride-hailing company breached its contracts with drivers by deducting "safe rides" fees from driver fares, saying Uber drafted "a bad contract" that doesn't define certain essential terms.
-
December 08, 2016
Uber Drivers Must Arbitrate Claims In Safe Rides Fee Row
Uber drivers who signed arbitration agreements must arbitrate their breach of contract claims against the ride-hailing app over the charging of a "safe rides fee," a California federal judge ruled Thursday, pointing to Uber's pledge to shoulder the full share of the arbitration costs.
-
October 26, 2016
Uber Drivers Push For Cert. In Safe Rides Fee Dispute
Uber drivers asked a California federal judge on Tuesday to certify their proposed breach-of-contract class action accusing the ride-hailing giant of improperly taking a cut of their fares by instituting a "safe rides fee," insisting that Uber's bid to force the fight into arbitration doesn't fly.