Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Fred Segal, LLC v. Cormackhill, LP
Case Number:
2:16-cv-06653
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
February 12, 2018
LA Property Owner Pushes For Trial In Fred Segal TM Suit
A Los Angeles retail property investor facing trademark infringement claims from Fred Segal LLC urged a California federal judge on Monday to "at a minimum" send the case to a jury after she tentatively ruled to dismiss their counterclaims alleging they have a right to keep the fashion brand's sign up on an iconic ivy-covered property on Melrose Avenue.
-
September 06, 2016
Fred Segal Sues Property Buyer For Refusing To Strip Signs
Los Angeles-based clothing retailer Fred Segal and its parent company smacked CormackHill LP with a trademark infringement and unfair competition suit in California federal court Friday, saying the retail property investor has continued to use Fred Segal signage on a recently purchased building without permission.