Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Barnstable County v. 3M Company et al
Case Number:
1:17-cv-40002
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bowditch & Dewey
- Brewer Attorneys
- Day Pitney
- Dechert LLP
- Eckert Seamans
- Gray Layton
- Greenberg Traurig
- Kennedy & Madonna
- Kenney & Sams
- Littler Mendelson
- Mayer Brown
- Mintz Levin
- SL Environmental Law Group
- Sloane & Walsh
- Tarlow Breed
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 16, 2018
3M, Tyco Say Mass. County's Fire Foam Suit Is Still Too Vague
A group of chemical companies, including 3M Co., Chemguard Inc. and Tyco Fire Products LP, asked a Massachusetts federal judge late Tuesday to toss a $10 million suit filed by a Cape Cod county over their firefighting foam products, saying the county's second stab at its contamination allegations are still not specific enough.
-
June 07, 2017
3M, Tyco Want Firefighting Foam Contamination Suit Tossed
Chemical companies including 3M, United Technologies and Tyco Fire Products LP asked a federal judge in Massachusetts on Wednesday to dismiss a county's lawsuit over their firefighting foam products, arguing that the county's contamination allegations are premature and far too vague.