Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Case Number:
3:17-cv-00108
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baker Botts
- Boies Schiller
- Cravath Swaine
- DLA Piper
- Eimer Stahl
- Fish & Richardson
- Gibson Dunn
- Jones Day
- King & Spalding
- K&L Gates
- McCracken Stemerman
- Norton Rose
- Paul Weiss
- Perkins Coie
- Quinn Emanuel
- Squire Patton
- Steven Williams Law
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Venable LLP
- Vinson & Elkins
- Wiggin & Dana
- Willkie Farr
- WilmerHale
- Wilson Sonsini
Companies
- Apple Inc.
- ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
- BlackBerry Ltd.
- Broadcom Inc.
- Foxconn
- Intel Corp.
- Kyocera Corporation
- Lenovo Group Ltd.
- LG Electronics Inc.
- MediaTek Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Pegatron Corp.
- QUALCOMM Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- Via Licensing Corp.
- Wistron Corp.
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 20, 2017
Apple Attacks Qualcomm's Business Model In Chip Suit
Apple has expanded the scope of its suit against Qualcomm that originally accused the chipmaker of grossly overcharging for chip patent licenses and withholding nearly $1 billion in rebates, taking aim in a Tuesday amended complaint at the chipmaker's entire business model.
-
April 11, 2017
Apple Hit With Counterclaims In $1B Qualcomm Royalty Row
Qualcomm slammed Apple with a slew of counterclaims in California federal court on Monday, alleging the iPhone maker is lowballing license terms for Qualcomm's standard essential patent technology, breaching cooperation agreements and making billions of dollars off of other companies' innovations.
-
January 20, 2017
Apple Sues Qualcomm Over Royalty 'Extortion,' $1B Withheld
Apple accused Qualcomm on Friday in California federal court of illegal business practices, overcharging Apple "billions of dollars" in royalties, withholding nearly $1 billion in rebates and trying to extort Apple after it cooperated in a Korean regulator's investigation into the chipmaker's licensing practices.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next →