Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Deras v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Case Number:
3:17-cv-05452
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 26, 2019
VW Can't Dodge Suit Over Spontaneously Shattering Sunroofs
Volkswagen will have to face a proposed class action alleging it knowingly sold vehicles with spontaneously shattering sunroofs, after a California federal judge on Tuesday said the buyers had provided adequate evidence that the German automaker knew about the defect.
-
August 28, 2018
Drivers Slam VW Bid To Ditch Defective Sunroof Suit
Drivers claiming in a proposed class action that Volkswagen knowingly sold them vehicles with spontaneously shattering sunroofs fired back at the carmaker's motion to dismiss the case, asserting Tuesday that numerous customer complaints to federal transportation officials and auto manufacturers' recalls over similar problems made Volkswagen well aware of the defect.
-
May 17, 2018
VW Gets Claims Trimmed In Defective Sunroof Class Action
A California federal judge on Thursday tossed most of the claims in a Volkswagen driver's proposed class action accusing the carmaker of selling vehicles with sunroofs that might "spontaneously shatter," saying an amendment would be necessary to revive state consumer protection and fraud claims.