Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Sciabacucchi et al v. Barton et al
Case Number:
2:17-cv-01568
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Derivative Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Badgley Mullins
- Breskin Johnson
- Fennemore Craig
- Gainey McKenna
- Gibson Dunn
- Levi & Korsinsky
- Mayer Brown
- Perkins Coie
- Shook Hardy
- Terrell Marshall
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 30, 2023
Zillow Gets OK To Settle Shareholder Suit Over CFPB Probe
A Seattle federal judge has signed off on a deal requiring Zillow to pay $1.3 million in attorney fees and alter its board composition to end its shareholders' consolidated derivative lawsuit accusing the board of engaging in a co-marketing scheme that drew scrutiny from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
-
April 21, 2023
Zillow Settles Shareholders' Suit Over Co-Marketing Scheme
Zillow will pay $1.3 million in attorney fees and adjust its board composition for a settlement that aims to end shareholders' consolidated derivative suit accusing the board's directors of engaging in a co-marketing scheme that drew the attention of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
-
May 28, 2020
Seattle Fed. Courts May Not Hold Trials Until 2021, Judge Says
A Seattle federal judge made an educated guess this week that civil and criminal jury trials in the Western District of Washington will likely not resume until at least 2021 due to the spread of the deadly coronavirus.
-
February 28, 2020
Zillow Board Must Face Suit Over Co-Marketing Scheme
Zillow's board of directors can't shake a derivative shareholder suit accusing them of allowing an illegal co-marketing deal that drew the attention of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, after a Washington federal judge found Friday the majority of the directors may have been biased.
-
August 23, 2019
Zillow Board Wants Derivative Suit Over CFPB Probe Tossed
Current and former directors of Zillow Group Inc. say shareholders alleging the company used an illegal co-marketing deal that drew the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's attention failed to take their concerns to the board before filing suit.