Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Cellspin Soft, Inc. v. Fitbit LLC
Case Number:
4:17-cv-05928
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Corcoran IP Law
- Desmarais LLP
- Edmonds & Schlather
- Garteiser Honea
- Goodwin Procter
- King & Spalding
- Morrison Foerster
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 16, 2023
Judge Slams 'Meritless' Recusal Bid Over Alleged Google Ties
A California federal judge who determined that companies including Fitbit and Nike didn't infringe patents held by Cellspin Soft for systems that automatically publish social media content has refused to recuse herself from the case at Cellspin's request, calling the bid "a futile attempt" to sidestep the appeals process.
-
February 06, 2023
Fitbit, Nikon Fight Post-Dismissal Recusal Bid In Patent Cases
Cellspin Soft Inc. waited until after it lost a set of patent suits against Fitbit Inc., Nikon Inc. and other companies before trying to remove a California federal judge over her supposed financial interests in the litigation, two defendants told the court Friday.
-
January 23, 2023
Cellspin Wants Patent Loss Erased Over Judge's Google Ties
Cellspin Soft Inc. wants to undo its recent defeat in sprawling patent litigation against Nike Inc., Fitbit Inc., Under Armour Inc. and others, arguing the California federal judge handling the case should have recused herself in 2021 because of her ownership of stock in Fitbit-parent Google and her husband's "substantial business ties" to the tech giant.
-
October 06, 2022
Nike, Fitbit And Others Lose $9M Atty Fee Bid In Patent Fight
A California federal judge on Thursday denied a $9 million attorney fee bid sought by Nike, Fitbit, Under Armour and others in patent litigation initiated by Cellspin Soft over systems that automatically publish social media content, rejecting arguments that the case is so exceptional that it warrants fees.
-
June 16, 2022
Nike, Fitbit, Others Shake Cellspin's Tech Patent Suit
A California federal judge has handed a win to Nike Inc., Fitbit Inc., Under Armour Inc. and others in patent litigation lodged by Cellspin Soft Inc. over systems that can automatically publish social media content, finding that the allegations lacked substance.
-
April 15, 2021
Nike, Fitbit And Others Trim But Can't Beat Cellspin IP Suits
A California federal judge on Wednesday trimmed Cellspin Soft Inc.'s patent claims against Nike, Fitbit and others, finding that four of eight categories of claims within three Cellspin patents do not demonstrate inventive concepts on data uploading and transmitting, while declining to invalidate the patents.
-
June 12, 2018
Cellspin Denies Shaking Down Nike, Others With IP Suits
Cellspin Soft Inc. urged a California federal judge Tuesday to reject bids for attorneys' fees by GoPro, Nike, Fitbit and other companies that beat Cellspin's lawsuits alleging their fitness trackers and GPS devices infringe its data-uploading patents, arguing it litigated the cases reasonably and saying "there's no evidence this was a shakedown."
-
April 25, 2018
Nike, FitBit, Others Seek Atty Fees For Data Uploading IP Suit
GoPro, Nike, Fitbit and several other companies that beat lawsuits filed by Cellspin Soft Inc. alleging their fitness-tracking and GPS devices infringed its data uploading patent asked a federal court Tuesday to award them attorneys' fees for having to defend a "meritless" case.
-
April 04, 2018
Nike, Fitbit, Others Escape Suit Over Data Uploading Patent
Nike Inc., Fitbit Inc. and a handful of other companies escaped a bundle of lawsuits alleging they'd infringed a data uploading patent when a California federal judge ruled the technology described in the patents, which involve uploading with a Bluetooth connection, wasn't patent-eligible under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling.
-
March 06, 2018
Nike, Others Say Alice Nixes 11 Cellspin Soft IP Suits
Nike, Fitbit and nine other companies urged a federal judge Tuesday to toss nine lawsuits brought by Cellspin Soft accusing them of infringing four data uploading patents with their fitness trackers and other products, arguing the patents describe abstract ideas that aren't patentable under the Supreme Court's 2014 Alice ruling.