Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Gilberto Garza, Jr., Petitioner v. Idaho
Case Number:
17-1026
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 27, 2019
Split High Court Upholds Post-Plea Appeal Rights
A defendant whose lawyer's poor performance scuttled his chances at an appeal should be presumed to have been harmed by the lawyer's actions, even if the defendant has waived his appeal rights through a plea deal, the U.S. Supreme Court held in a split opinion on Wednesday.
-
October 30, 2018
Justices Appear Aligned On Post-Plea Appeal Rights
U.S. Supreme Court justices from both sides of the bench on Tuesday seemed sympathetic to the idea that a defendant has the right to have a lawyer file an appeal even after waiving the right to most appellate claims via a plea agreement, and pushed back on arguments from federal and state prosecutors.