Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Dennis Obduskey, Petitioner v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP
Case Number:
17-1307
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Firms
- Barron & Newburger
- Gilbert Garcia Group
- Maddin Hauser
- Mayer Brown
- McCalla Raymer
- Messner Reeves
- Paul Weiss
- Womble Bond
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 20, 2019
Supreme Court Says Foreclosure Firms Not Debt Collectors
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that law firms that conduct nonjudicial foreclosures, or foreclosures outside of the court system, are not generally considered debt collectors under a key federal law that sets out a host of restrictions on the debt collection business.
-
January 07, 2019
Justices Eye Debt Collection Law's Reach In Foreclosure Case
The U.S. Supreme Court mulled the applicability of a key federal law regulating debt collection to nonjudicial foreclosures during oral arguments on Monday, with some conservative justices raising doubts about how different the widely used tool is from collecting a debt.