Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
April 30, 2018
William et al v. Morrison & Foerster LLP
Case Number:
3:18-cv-02542
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Baker McKenzie
- Coblentz Patch
- Freshfields
- Gibson Dunn
- Goodwin Procter
- Sanford Heisler
- Seyfarth Shaw
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 22, 2022
MoFo, Ex-Attys Agree To End 'Mommy Track' Bias Suit
Morrison & Foerster LLP and two of its former lawyers resolved a California federal court suit that accused the firm of placing the women on a less lucrative "mommy track" because they took advantage of the company's maternity leave policy, the parties confirmed Tuesday.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login