Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Magana v. Doordash, Inc.
Case Number:
3:18-cv-03395
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Firms
-
June 06, 2022
DoorDash Misclassification Suit Shuttered In Mutual Request
A California federal judge approved a joint request by DoorDash and a worker to dismiss a suit filed against the app-based delivery service company alleging it misclassified workers as independent contractors to avoid paying business-related expenses.
-
June 11, 2018
DoorDash Moves Drivers' Misclassification Suit To Fed. Court
Online food delivery app DoorDash Inc. on Friday removed to California federal court a proposed class action accusing the company of misclassifying drivers as independent contractors and unlawfully requiring them to pay business expenses, saying the federal court has jurisdiction under the U.S. Class Action Fairness Act.