Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Head et al v. Citigroup Incorporated et al
Case Number:
3:18-cv-08189
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 09, 2024
Citibank's $29.5M Deal To End Robocall Row Gets First Nod
An Arizona federal judge has signed off on a deal that requires Citibank NA to pay $29.5 million to settle long-running litigation pressed by a class of noncustomers who accused the bank of bombarding them with unauthorized robocalls in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
-
June 18, 2024
Noncustomers Cinch Settlement In Citibank Robocall Suit
Citibank has reached a deal with a class of noncustomers who accused the bank of bombarding them with unauthorized robocalls, according to a notice filed in Arizona federal court, ending six years of litigation alleging Citibank had violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
-
January 28, 2022
Noncustomers Get Class Cert. In Citibank Robocall Dispute
A proposed class accusing Citibank of blasting noncustomers with unauthorized robocalls won certification on Friday, after an Arizona federal judge rejected the bank's argument that there was no common way to determine whether it had consent to call each class member.